|
|
 |
The Return of Native Americans as Immigrants
New America Media, Commentary, Louis E.V.
Nevaer, Posted: Oct 24, 2007
The United States is seeing a resurgence of Native Americans in
the form of immigrants who are descendents of North America’s indigenous
populations. As Native Americans, they are terrifying precisely because
they have a moral claim to cross the borders imposed on their lands,
writes NAM contributor Louis E.V. Nevaer.
As the immigration debate rages throughout the nation,
the lingering, but unspoken, fear is that illegal immigration from
Mexico heralds the return of the Native American.
“The persistent inflow of Hispanic immigrants threatens to divide the
United States into two peoples, two cultures, and two languages,” Samuel
Huntington famously argued in Foreign Affairs magazine in March 2004,
unleashing a firestorm of protests among U.S. Hispanics and Latinos.
“Unlike past immigrant groups, Mexicans and other Latinos have not
assimilated into mainstream U.S. culture, forming instead their own
political and linguistic enclaves — from Los Angeles to Miami — and
rejecting the Anglo-Protestant values that built the American dream.”
In fact, almost all Mexican immigrants are descendents of North
America’s indigenous peoples. As Native Americans, they are terrifying
precisely because they have a moral claim to migrate throughout the
nation-states imposed on their lands.
This vilification of immigrants differs from the same sentiment of
earlier generations. Previously, Americans debated and settled
immigration issues through legislation: the Alien and Sedition Acts of
1798 to keep French and Irish Catholics out, the anti-Papist sentiment
that fueled Nativism in the 19th century aimed at Italian, Irish and
German immigrants, the xenophobia that culminated in the Chinese
Exclusion Act of 1882, and the “Gentlemen’s Agreement” of 1907 aimed at
the Japanese.
In “The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order,”
Huntington argued that the Mexican state was complementary to the
American one, both heirs of Europe and the Enlightenment. This suggests
that the cultural conflict he fears is between Western versus Native
American.
He is correct. Native Americans are indifferent to the Western values
used to obliterate them, and he recognizes the moral authority with
which they challenge the very concept of the nation-state.
To refuse entry to immigrants from across the oceans, from Europe or
Asia, is one thing; to stand against the internal movements of Native
American people, Americans find unsettling. They can’t forget that
efforts to transplant and expand European civilization in the New World
have been the driving force behind the settling of the West in the 19th
century and the exclusion of Native Americans from the mainstream of
society in the 20th.
It almost worked: There are no Manhattans on the island of Manhattan, no
Coast Miwok in San Francisco.
“The only good Injun is a dead Injun,” is a line in a Hollywood Western
that sums up the nation’s attitude during the 19th century, and it is
true that Native Americans were massacred, subjected to forced
migrations and deliberately infected with contagious diseases so as to
reduce their numbers. It is also true that during the last century, the
establishment of reservations created marginalized communities where
alcoholism, substance abuse and unemployment demoralized Native
Americans into early graves.
Now, peoples rendered almost irrelevant to American society are thriving
in such large numbers that they are once again on the move across the
continent.
The return of the Native American began in earnest in the 1980s, during
the Sanctuary Movement in California. Suddenly, people apprehended at
the borders spoke neither English nor Spanish. Isa Gucciardi, who
managed a translation company in San Francisco, reported getting calls
from the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), as it was called
then, with requests for interpreters who spoke “Indian” languages from
southern Mexico and Central America. “We had to double the rate, since
it was so difficult to find anyone who spoke English and Tzotzil Maya,”
she said.
Despite their best efforts to wipe them out, at the start of the 21st
century, Zapotec, Mixtec, Maya and scores of other indigenous peoples
have returned.
They are working in our restaurants, stocking shelves in our stores,
building houses and doing our landscaping. They are taking care of our
kids while we’re at the office, and giving birth to more Native
Americans in our hospitals. They are fueling the economic expansion,
contributing to a society that looks upon them with disdain.
Yet in the second half of 20th century, it was Europeans who looked on
Americans with disdain. Walt Whitman celebrated America being one people
out of many – “Of every hue and caste am I” – but to the Europeans,
hyphenated Americans are mongrels and half-breeds: Irish-Americans,
African-Americans, Italian-Americans, Anglo-Americans.
The realization that Native Americans are crossing the borders that
crossed them is alarming even Jesse Jackson. Interviewed on CNN’s “Lou
Dobbs Tonight,” he complained that the workers streaming into New
Orleans were “outside workers,” since he could not bring himself to say
“Native Americans from Latin America.”
My office in New York is in the Citigroup Center where the only Native
American used to be the “Manna-Hata” Indian on the seal stenciled on the
flag of the City of New York, standing next to an early Dutch colonist.
Not anymore. Now when I go to the lobby and downstairs into the subway
concourse that connects the Uptown Number 6 train with the E and V
subways, there are Maya women, wearing their traditional textiles. Their
babies strapped on their backs in shawls, with a blanket made of blue
basket, they lay out before them for sale probably the last thing that
is actually made in New York City: pirated DVDs of Hollywood movies.
Having rid ourselves of the Manna-Hata people, we import Native
Americans from Mexico.
Given this demographic trend, it’s only a matter of time before we hear,
“Press three to continue in Zapotec.”
|