Women Hotel Workers Suffer High Injury Rates
By Seth Sandronsky
New America Media
Dec 06, 2009
Working in a hotel can
be hazardous to your health, especially for women and ethnic minorities,
according to a recent study of occupational injuries.
The study is one of the
first studies of injury incidence, rate and risk ratios by gender,
employer, ethnicity, job group and race in the U.S. hotel industry.
Researchers found that
female hotel workers over-all were 1.5 times more likely to suffer
injuries than males. Injuries to Hispanic female hotel workers were
nearly twice that of white females. Meanwhile, Asian and Hispanic male
employee injuries were 1.5 times greater than whites.
Susan Buchanan, MD, of
the University of Illinois Chicago School of Public Health, is the lead
author of the study, presented at a recent meeting of the American
Public Health Association in Philadelphia. “These alarming results raise
many questions as to why injury rates are so high for women and Hispanic
and Asian workers in the hotel sector,” she said.
Buchanan and her
co-researchers analyzed federal Occupational Safety and Health
Administration data between 2003 and 2005 on nearly 3,000 worker
injuries in five hotel job categories at 50 unionized properties of
Hilton Worldwide, Hyatt Hotels, InterContinental Hotels Group, Marriott
International and Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide. Non-whites
comprised 80 percent of the hotel employees in the study.
The companies supplied
the OSHA data to the labor union Unite Here, AFL-CIO, which represents
100,000 hotel workers at more than 900 properties in the United States
and Canada. In turn, the union provided financial help. Joanna Shimekan,
an independent consultant statistician associated with the University of
Illinois School of Public Health, analyzed the data.
At least one hotel
company was skeptical of the study’s findings. “While we take seriously
all valid research regarding workplace safety, we have not had the
opportunity to thoroughly review the data and design of the Unite Here
study,” said Amy Patti, a Hyatt spokeswoman. “However, it is clear to us
that the union’s conclusions are not consistent with the workplace
environment in our hotels.”
John Wilhelm, the
president of Unite Here, disagrees with Patti. “Hyatt, with the highest
reported injury rate for housekeepers, needs to make changes immediately
that will keep housekeepers safe and pain-free at work,” he said.
Unite Here’s labor
contracts with Hyatt in Chicago and San Francisco ended in August. Union
workers in San Francisco protested the stalled talks with a three-day
strike before returning to work in November.
Every fifth employee in
the study worked in housekeeping, and had the highest risk of being
hurt, researchers found.
Consider Celia Alvarez,
a former housekeeper. She experienced a permanent injury working at a
non-union Hyatt property in Long Beach. “Cleaning between 25 to 30 rooms
a day demands working fast and this is how I hurt my body,” she said.
There isn't time to take care of our bodies. I have pain every day."
In each job category
studied, the most common injury was to the upper extremity, according to
the researchers. Injuries to the back and lower extremities of hotel
workers were next in frequency.
Employees at
non-unionized hotels may be less likely to report their injuries to
management, the study noted. Thus, unrepresented hotel employees who do
not collectively bargain working conditions with employers could have
higher injury rates than their union counterparts.
The study did not
conclusively pinpoint the links among company, gender, ethnicity, race
and job factors and injury disparities. “The excess risk among Hispanic
housekeepers compared to other housekeepers is more difficult to
explain, and requires further study,” said Laura Punnett, ScD, of the
University of Massachusetts Lowell, a co-author of the study.
Future examination
should focus on injury prevention methods for hotel workers, according
to Niklas Krause, MD, a co-researcher on the study at the University of
California, San Francisco. “It is time, especially for those companies
with the worst rates,” he said, “to make a concerted effort to halt this
disparate occurrence of work-related pain and suffering.”
The union-backed study
presented at the recent APHA meeting will appear in the peer-reviewed
American Journal of Industrial Medicine in January.
Seth Sandronsky
lives and writes in Sacramento. Contact
ssandronsky@yahoo.com.
|